ReliovaOpen-model token supply
Illustrative structure

Sample qualification report

This example shows what a decision-ready report contains. Numbers below are illustrative, not results for a named model route or a price offer from Reliova.

Example only. Replace all sample figures with measurements from the customer’s approved workload.

Decision summary

Conditional go: Candidate B meets the quality floor and lowers modeled unit cost, but should not receive interactive traffic until p90 TTFT and the error behavior at target concurrency are accepted in a production qualification window.

Test definition

WorkloadCustomer support summarization + structured extraction
Sample500 de-identified requests, stratified by length and difficulty
Quality floor≥ baseline pass rate; zero new critical extraction errors
Traffic targetIllustrative only: 20 concurrent requests
Run windowRecorded with UTC timestamps and model identifiers

What the report shows

  • Pass rate and failure taxonomy with reviewed examples
  • p50, p90, and p99 latency—not a single average
  • Output tokens per second after first token
  • Error and retry counts at each concurrency level
  • Usage-field reconciliation and modeled cost range
  • Data path, retention, support, and operational questions
  • Migration gates, rollback trigger, and recommended next test

What it does not claim

The report does not certify an underlying model’s undisclosed weights, promise future performance, or generalize beyond the tested route and configuration. Production details are confirmed for the selected service configuration.

Start small

Fund a test balance. Measure real usage.

Tell us the model and expected token volume. We will return the current public selling rate and the smallest practical starting balance.