ReliovaAI cost optimization
AI BILL MATCHUP · OPENAI-COMPATIBLE

Lower the bill behind the AI you already use.

Reliova benchmarks selected DeepSeek, GLM and Kimi routes against your current workload. Keep your integration. Move only when we can demonstrate meaningful savings at an acceptable quality and latency.

No credentials or proprietary prompts required for the first review.

Bill-first analysisStart from your actual usage pattern
Equivalent qualityCheaper counts only when the output clears the bar
OpenAI-compatibleMinimize integration work when a route qualifies
Measured savingsToken, cache, reasoning and retry costs reconciled
How it works

Compare first. Migrate second.

Reliova is designed around one decision: whether a selected route can lower the effective cost of your real workload without breaking the result your product needs.

01 · BASELINE

Read the current bill

Share model names, token categories, request volume and current effective cost. A billing export is useful; credentials and raw prompts are not required.

OutputA normalized cost and usage baseline.
02 · MATCHUP

Test the workload

Run approved, de-identified examples across selected routes. Measure accepted outputs, latency, retries, cache behavior and total billed tokens.

OutputA decision-ready comparison with limitations.
03 · MOVE

Shift bounded traffic

Use an OpenAI-compatible endpoint for a controlled production slice. Expand only after observed usage matches the modeled economics.

OutputA migration gate, spend limit and rollback path.
Where savings come from

Not one discount. A controlled cost path.

Route economics matter, but so do model choice, reasoning output, cache behavior, failed calls and repeated context. Reliova exposes the contributors instead of hiding them behind one balance.

MODEL RATEREASONINGCACHERETRIESQUALIFYLOWER EFFECTIVE COST
MEASURECOMPAREQUALIFYMIGRATE
The decision metric

Cost per accepted result.

A lower price per million tokens can still produce a higher bill when a model emits more reasoning, requires retries or fails the task. The useful comparison is the total cost of equivalent accepted work.

EFFECTIVE SAVINGS1 − Reliova cost for accepted work ÷ current cost for accepted work
  • Same approved task set and acceptance criteria
  • Input, cached input, reasoning and visible output separated
  • Failed calls and retries included
  • Latency and throughput measured under bounded concurrency
  • Model route and configuration recorded
Selected routes

A focused catalog, priced visibly.

Reliova starts with a small set of cost-performance routes. Published selling rates are maintained in WordPress and timestamped; availability and production terms are confirmed before activation.

GLM-5.3

glm-5.3
$0.15Input / 1M
Cached / 1M
$0.52Output / 1M

Reliova public rate; cached input is billed as standard input unless stated otherwise.

GLM-5.2

glm-5.2
$0.15Input / 1M
Cached / 1M
$0.52Output / 1M

Reliova public rate; cached input is billed as standard input unless stated otherwise.

Kimi-K3

kimi-k3
$2.98Input / 1M
$0.30Cached / 1M
$14.90Output / 1M

Reliova public rate for the listed token categories.

DeepSeek V4 Pro

deepseek-v4-pro
$0.60Input / 1M
$0.022Cached / 1M
$2.01Output / 1M

Reliova public rate; thinking configuration can materially change billed output.

DeepSeek V4 Flash

deepseek-v4-flash
$0.22Input / 1M
$0.0070Cached / 1M
$0.67Output / 1M

Reliova public rate; optimized for cost-sensitive, latency-sensitive traffic.

Reliova published selling rates · Updated Sep 15, 2026 · 18:43 UTC. Prices may change prospectively; an approved quote controls the pilot.

Request a bill review

Start with numbers, not a migration commitment.

Tell us what you use and what it costs. We will identify whether there is a credible matchup worth testing. Do not submit API keys, credentials, proprietary prompts, personal data or regulated information.

✓ First review can use aggregated data✓ No production endpoint claimed at MVP stage✓ Recommendation includes limitations

Email: randy.qin@reliova.com

A measured first step

Bring the bill. Keep the quality bar.

We compare your existing workload with qualified model routes. Move only when the measured economics, quality and latency make sense.